In our readings from Principles of Journalism the underlying basis of Proportionality and Comprehensiveness is explained with the analogy of a map that helps readers find their way through today's society. By keeping articles in proportion and highlighting the important matters of society these principles of journalism act as cornerstones of truthfulness. By inflating certain situations and neglecting others news can either broaden or blur the map. In order to keep the map in appropriate proportion our news must cover stories of all demographics not just the ones that seem attractive and appealing.
But as consumers of news do we really pick up the newspaper in order to find our way to a specific destination as we would a map? Do we as readers really want to know about the things we are not interested in? When reading a map we pay attention to specific details that will help us arrive at a specific destination without conflict. I know that personally, when I pick up a paper I am not necessarily looking for directions for my journey through society. This leads to the question of whether or not news has simply become more a form of entertainment rather than that of a guide through society.
As stated, these principles are supposed to be a piece of foundation for truth. So how exactly should we as journalists use these principles of proportionality and comprehensiveness in order to best inform the public? I believe that by reporting the most important news in the most efficient and comprehensive way possible we can achieve this cornerstone of truth. By paying close attention to and balancing demographics, as well control over hype, and an appeal to a broad audience Journalists can more fully inform and empower their audience.
